Why a Divergent Fed — Even After a Rate Cut — Proves You Should Stop Chasing Macro Noise

Sep 24 / Cayden Chang

Share this article:

Most investors and traders still live and die by the Fed’s next move. Every hint of a rate hike or cut sends screens flashing, valuations rebasing, and portfolios rotating. For years, following Fed signals seemed like a shortcut to timing the market.

But this time is different. The Fed is deeply divided, and even after it finally cut rates, markets are still trying to interpret which Fed will dominate going forward. The resulting confusion reinforces why value investors should stop chasing macro noise, and double down on company fundamentals.

In this post, we’ll:

  • Outline how divided the Fed is, even after a cut
  • Explain how markets reacted to the rate cut (and why the ambiguity persists)

  • Show how a value investor can ride through the noise

  • Introduce CFOS (Cash Flow Options Strategy) - a method Warren Buffett uses to generate regular income while waiting for better entry points

The Fed Is Divided — Not United

To grasp the chaos, here are the specifics:
  • Hawkish voices prevail for now. Three Fed officials, Beth Hammack, Raphael Bostic, and Alberto Musalem, have expressed public anxiety over inflation. The PCE excluding food and energy is running near 3% annually, clearly above the Fed’s 2% target. Bostic said, “I am concerned about the inflation that has been too high for a long time,” signaling reluctance to cut rates in October 2025. These officials point to tariffs and other pressures as persistent inflation drivers, making them cautious against aggressive easing.
  • A lone dove pushes back. Fed Governor Stephen Miran stands out: he calls for sharp cuts, targeting a federal funds rate of 2.75%–3.0% by year-end. He downplays tariff-driven inflation and argues that easing rental demand (through immigration policy) could relieve major inflation pressure. At the FOMC’s September meeting, he dissented, pushing for a half-point cut rather than the quarter point that prevailed. His posture raises questions about the Fed’s independence given his close alignment with the White House.

In short: One camp is worried about runaway inflation, the other pushing for aggressive easing. The “middle ground” is thin. The result: no clear signal dominates.

The Rate Cut — And Yet the Fed Remains Fragmented

Crucially, the cut was framed as “risk-management”, not a shift in regime. Powell and others emphasized that future easing hinges on data, especially labor market weakness. They cautioned against cutting too quickly and reviving inflation pressure.


On September 17, 2025, the FOMC cut the federal funds rate by 25 basis points, lowering it to 4.00%–4.25%. But this was not a unified move. Miran dissented, arguing for a deeper cut. The dot plot (a map of FOMC members’ rate expectations) showed wide dispersion: one forecast was 2.875%, substantially lower than many peers.

So yes, we got a rate cut, but it didn’t heal the fracture in the Fed.

Market Reactions: Mixed, Volatile, Uncertain

Even with the cut, markets remain jittery:
  1. Yields didn’t fall uniformly. Long-term yields (e.g. 10-year Treasury) ticked higher instead of collapsing. The market expected more easing; when it didn’t materialize cleanly, the yield curve adjusted in response.
  2. Banks lowered prime rates. Big U.S. banks, JPMorgan, Bank of America, Wells Fargo, Citigroup, moved their prime lending rates down from 7.50% to 7.25%, signaling support for credit expansion. But lower prime rates also squeeze bank margins.
  3. Stocks rallied, but cautiously. Growth names and tech initially led the bounce, but the rally lacked conviction. Investors are still parsing which Fed faction will win the internal battle, so each speech, each data release, provokes knee-jerk moves.
  4. Rate expectations remain murky. Markets are now pricing in ~2 more quarter-point cuts by year-end, but that’s fluid. Divergent dot plots, mixed messaging, and data surprises keep this range in flux.

In short: the market is reacting — but not cleanly. The cut didn’t bring clarity, it just added noise.

Meta Case Study: How Fundamentals Outlast Macro Confusion

Let’s return to Meta. Even amid a volatile backdrop, a rate cut on one hand, Fed discord on the other, Meta continued delivering:
  • Resilient Ad Revenue: Advertisers often maintain budgets through cycles. Meta’s massive scale and global reach mean it can absorb short-term headwinds.
  • Product & Platform Momentum: The company’s investments in AI, Reels, and metaverse assets anchor long-term value beyond macro suspense.
  • Opportunity from Overreaction: When markets waver on macro speculation, Meta shares sometimes dip below intrinsic value, creating entry points for disciplined investors.

Meta is living proof that when you focus on the right things, earnings power, growth pathways, competitive moat. Even a divided Fed and wavering markets can’t keep value-building businesses down.

Enter CFOS — Cash Flow Options Strategy

What if you could earn cash while waiting for the price to correct to your “right level”? That’s what CFOS is for.

CFOS is built around the idea of collecting options premium as downside protection and income while you wait for the underlying stock to reach your target valuation. It’s inspired by Warren Buffett’s use of options, especially selling puts on stocks he wants to own, plus more modern option strategy layering.

The Buffett-Style Foundation

  1. Premiums inflate in uncertainty. As the Fed fights internally and macro uncertainty rises, implied volatility rises, making option premiums richer. That works in your favor when you're selling premium.
  • Buffers short-term risk. When markets get whipsawed on Fed speeches or data, the premium you’ve collected cushions your downside.
  • Anchors you in fundamentals. Because you're not speculating on macro direction, you're anchoring your trades in the businesses you believe in.
These aren’t reckless options bets. They’re structured, prudent, value-aligned moves.

How CFOS Works (High-Level Steps)

  1. Select a target stock you already believe has solid fundamentals (e.g. Meta).
  2. Choose a strike price below the current market (your comfort zone) where you'd be okay owning it.
  3. Sell a cash-secured put at that strike and collect premium. You hold enough cash to buy it if assigned.
  4. If assigned, you own the stock at your target or a better adjusted basis (because premium collected reduces your cost).
  5. If unassigned, you keep the premium and can repeat or roll the option.
  6. Optionally, layer in covered calls or other strategies to monetize portions of your position while holding.
The beauty of CFOS: You monetize your patience. Volatility, rather than being a curse, becomes your ally.

Why CFOS Makes Sense in a Divergent Fed Environment

  • Premiums inflate in uncertainty. As the Fed fights internally and macro uncertainty rises, implied volatility rises, making option premiums richer. That works in your favor when you're selling options.
  • Buffers short-term risk. When markets get whipsawed on Fed speeches or data, the premium you’ve collected cushions your downside.
  • Anchors you in fundamentals. Because you're not speculating on macro direction, you're anchoring your trades in the businesses you believe in.

Of course, this is NOT risk-free. If the stock tanks far below your strike, you’re obliged to buy at your strike price. So you only do CFOS on companies you’re comfortable owning at that level, within your Circle of Competence and with a strong economic moat and with a Margin of Safety, just like Buffett would.

Putting It All Together: Strategy in Action

This period may be confusing, but it is also opportunity-rich, for investors who refuse to be jerked around by macro headlines:

  1. Ignore the noise. Rate cuts, dot plots, dissent, they come and go.
  2. Anchor in fundamentals. Study balance sheets, margins, growth potential, and management execution.
  3. Use a margin of safety. When macro volatility is elevated, conservative valuation buffers matter even more.
  4. Use CFOS (when prudent). Collect premiums while waiting for favourable entry points
  5. Be patient: The market eventually converges with fundamentals

At the end of the day, whether the Fed lands dovish or hawkish, your returns will come from the businesses you own.

Final Thoughts & Your Next Move

The Fed is divided, the rate cut was messy, and markets remain on edge. But all that volatility is your opportunity — if you ground yourself in fundamentals and tactics like CFOS.

If you want to see CFOS in action, walk through real case studies (like Meta), and learn to build optionality-based income with discipline, join my upcoming webinar. Scroll down to register!

Share this article

How to Apply a Fundamental-First Approach to Investing

In the midst of global trade tensions and market uncertainties, discover how smart investors are adapting and thriving using ViA Atlas.

Presented by Cayden Chang

Founder of Value Investing Academy and Award-Winning International Speaker, Lifelong Learner Award 2008, Personal Brand Award 2017, 2025 Spirit of Enterprise Honouree

You will learn:

  • How to navigate market uncertainty amidst geopolitical tensions and market uncertainty
  • How can all-weather portfolio of stocks, bonds, and ETFs can help you stay calm and thrive no matter the market direction.
  • How Cash-Flow Options Strategies (CFOS), modelled after Warren Buffett's principles of Value Investing can help you cope with market uncertainty
  • How ViA Atlas could help you strengthen your portfolio and streamline your decision-making process
  • Actionable & Duplicable Step-By-Step Value Investing Framework on identifying high-quality resilent companies


Click the button below to reserve your spot now.